Skip to content

Kickstart Validation Report

Date: 2025-10-17 Reviewer: Code Review Agent Scope: Kickstart improvements for LLM-friendly project initialization

Executive Summary

Overall Quality Rating: 6/10

Status: INCOMPLETE - Critical template files missing

The kickstart system has strong foundational content in KICKSTART_PROMPT.md and KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md, but the implementation task was incomplete. The expected deliverables (KICKSTART_REPO.md and PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md in /templates directory) were not created.

Files Reviewed

Existing Files

  1. /home/william/git/standards/docs/guides/KICKSTART_PROMPT.md
  2. /home/william/git/standards/docs/guides/KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md
  3. /home/william/git/standards/examples/project_plan_example.md
  4. /home/william/git/standards/README.md

Missing Files (Critical)

  1. /home/william/git/standards/templates/KICKSTART_REPO.md - NOT CREATED
  2. /home/william/git/standards/templates/PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md - NOT CREATED

Detailed Analysis

1. KICKSTART_PROMPT.md (Existing)

Strengths:

  • Clear, structured prompt format for LLMs
  • Comprehensive analysis workflow (detect → map → blueprint → generate → validate)
  • Good integration with product matrix and standards router
  • Proper references to CLAUDE.md and product-matrix.yaml
  • Expected output format is well-defined
  • Includes NIST compliance integration

Weaknesses:

  • Missing critical context: No explanation of where to find project_plan.md template
  • Broken reference: References USING_PRODUCT_MATRIX.md which doesn't exist
  • Router syntax inconsistency: Uses @load syntax but doesn't explain fallback for LLMs without custom commands
  • No validation instructions: Doesn't tell users how to validate the output
  • Missing examples: Could benefit from a complete worked example

LLM Usability Score: 7/10

  • An LLM can understand and follow this, but gaps in references cause confusion

2. KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md (Existing)

Strengths:

  • Excellent progressive enhancement patterns
  • Technology-specific prompts are very helpful
  • Good troubleshooting section
  • Practical examples for different project types
  • Advanced patterns (microservices, migration, hybrid) are valuable
  • Custom templates for startup vs enterprise
  • Quick reference card is excellent

Weaknesses:

  • No link to basic kickstart prompt: Should reference KICKSTART_PROMPT.md at the top
  • Missing directory: References templates that don't exist
  • Inconsistent standard codes: Uses shorthand (CS:python) without explaining the full mapping
  • No verification steps: Advanced features but no way to validate they work

LLM Usability Score: 8/10

  • Very useful for advanced users, but assumes too much context

3. project_plan_example.md (Existing)

Strengths:

  • Comprehensive, realistic example
  • Covers all essential sections
  • Good balance of functional and non-functional requirements
  • Clear technology preferences
  • Includes team and timeline context

Weaknesses:

  • File location: Should be in /templates, not /examples
  • No instructions: Missing header explaining how to use this template
  • No validation criteria: Doesn't explain what makes a good project plan
  • Missing sections: Could include "Constraints" and "Open Questions"
  • No LLM-specific hints: Doesn't guide users on what LLMs need

LLM Usability Score: 7/10

  • Good example, but not positioned as a template

4. README.md (Updated)

Strengths:

  • Excellent Skills System section with clear token metrics
  • Good quick start examples with concrete numbers
  • Clear value proposition
  • Links to KICKSTART_PROMPT.md are present
  • Skills catalog is well-promoted

Weaknesses:

  • No mention of templates: Doesn't reference project plan templates
  • Kickstart section buried: Quick Start section could be more prominent
  • Missing prerequisites: Doesn't mention what users need before using kickstart

Integration Score: 8/10

  • Good integration but could better highlight the kickstart workflow

Critical Issues

1. Missing Template Files (Critical)

Issue: /home/william/git/standards/templates/ directory doesn't exist with expected files

Impact: HIGH - Users cannot follow the documented workflow

Recommendation: Create /home/william/git/standards/templates/ with:

  • KICKSTART_REPO.md - Step-by-step guide for new repository setup
  • PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md - Structured template with inline instructions

Example Structure for PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md:

# Project Plan Template

<!--
Instructions: Fill in each section below. Be specific and concrete.
This template is optimized for LLM analysis and code generation.
-->

## Project Overview
<!-- One paragraph describing what you're building and why -->

## Core Requirements
### Functional Requirements
<!-- List what the system must do -->

### Technical Requirements
<!-- List technical constraints and needs -->

## Preferred Technology Stack
<!-- Specify languages, frameworks, databases, hosting -->

## Non-Functional Requirements
<!-- Performance, security, scalability, testing requirements -->

## Team & Timeline
<!-- Team size, experience level, timeline expectations -->

## Special Considerations
<!-- Compliance, integrations, constraints, future plans -->

## Success Metrics
<!-- How you'll measure success -->

2. Broken Reference (Major)

Issue: KICKSTART_PROMPT.md references docs/guides/USING_PRODUCT_MATRIX.md which doesn't exist

Impact: MEDIUM - Creates confusion and broken documentation trail

Recommendation: Either create the file or update reference to point to existing documentation in CLAUDE.md

3. No Integration Test (Major)

Issue: No way to verify the kickstart workflow actually works

Impact: MEDIUM - Cannot validate improvements

Recommendation: Create /home/william/git/standards/tests/kickstart/test_kickstart_workflow.py:

"""Test that kickstart workflow produces expected outputs."""

def test_project_plan_template_exists():
    """Verify project plan template is present and valid."""
    template_path = "templates/PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md"
    assert os.path.exists(template_path)

    with open(template_path) as f:
        content = f.read()
        assert "Project Overview" in content
        assert "Core Requirements" in content

def test_kickstart_prompt_references_valid():
    """Verify all references in KICKSTART_PROMPT.md are valid."""
    # Check that referenced files exist
    # Validate @load syntax examples
    pass

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Documentation: KICKSTART_PROMPT.md covers all necessary steps
  2. Advanced Patterns: KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md provides excellent progressive disclosure
  3. Good Examples: project_plan_example.md is realistic and helpful
  4. Skills Integration: README.md properly promotes the new skills system
  5. Standards Alignment: Proper integration with CLAUDE.md router and product matrix
  6. LLM-Friendly Language: Generally uses clear, actionable instructions

Weaknesses

  1. Incomplete Implementation: Missing critical template files
  2. Broken References: Links to non-existent documentation
  3. No Validation: No tests or verification steps
  4. Inconsistent File Organization: Templates scattered across examples/ and docs/
  5. Missing Instructions: Templates lack usage guidance
  6. No Worked Example: No complete end-to-end example showing full workflow
  7. Router Syntax Confusion: @load syntax not explained for non-Claude-Code users

Recommendations

High Priority (Blockers)

  1. Create /home/william/git/standards/templates/ directory
  2. Move project_plan_example.md → templates/PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md
  3. Add inline instructions to the template

  4. Create KICKSTART_REPO.md with repository setup guide

  5. Fix Broken References

  6. Create docs/guides/USING_PRODUCT_MATRIX.md OR

  7. Update KICKSTART_PROMPT.md to reference CLAUDE.md directly

  8. Add Validation Instructions

  9. Update KICKSTART_PROMPT.md with "How to Verify Output" section
  10. Add checklist for reviewing generated project structure

Medium Priority (Quality)

  1. Create Complete Worked Example
  2. Add /home/william/git/standards/examples/kickstart-walkthrough.md
  3. Show full workflow: template → filled plan → LLM analysis → output

  4. Include actual LLM responses (anonymized)

  5. Improve Cross-References

  6. KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md should link to KICKSTART_PROMPT.md at top
  7. README.md should have dedicated "Kickstart Workflow" section

  8. All files should reference templates/ directory

  9. Add Router Syntax Guide

  10. Explain what @load does in Claude Code
  11. Provide fallback for web-based LLMs
  12. Show how to manually resolve product types

Low Priority (Enhancement)

  1. Create Interactive Checklist
  2. Add templates/KICKSTART_CHECKLIST.md

  3. Step-by-step verification of generated outputs

  4. Add Common Mistakes Section

  5. Document typical issues users face

  6. Provide quick fixes

  7. Create Video or GIF Walkthrough

  8. Visual demonstration of the workflow

Testing Validation

Mental Test Results

Scenario: I'm an LLM agent trying to kickstart a new Python API project

Step 1: Read KICKSTART_PROMPT.md

  • ✅ I understand what to do
  • ❌ I don't know where to get project_plan.md
  • ⚠️ I see @load syntax but don't know if I can execute it

Step 2: Look for project plan template

  • ❌ /templates/ directory doesn't exist
  • ⚠️ Found example in /examples/ but no instructions
  • ❌ Don't know if I should copy this or create my own

Step 3: Try to apply standards

  • ⚠️ USING_PRODUCT_MATRIX.md reference is broken
  • ✅ Can read CLAUDE.md but unclear how to apply without @load
  • ⚠️ Standards codes (CS:python) not fully explained

Conclusion: Workflow is 60% functional but has critical gaps

Quality Metrics

Aspect Score Notes
Documentation Clarity 8/10 Well-written but incomplete
LLM Friendliness 6/10 Good intent, missing context
Completeness 4/10 Missing critical files
Examples Quality 8/10 Realistic and helpful
Integration 7/10 Good CLAUDE.md alignment
Testability 2/10 No tests or validation
Usability 5/10 Works if you know what's missing

Overall Score: 6/10 (Needs Work)

Action Items for Improvement

Must Do (Required for MVP)

  • Create /home/william/git/standards/templates/ directory
  • Create templates/PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md with inline instructions
  • Create templates/KICKSTART_REPO.md for new repo setup
  • Fix or remove reference to USING_PRODUCT_MATRIX.md
  • Add "Verification Steps" section to KICKSTART_PROMPT.md

Should Do (Quality)

  • Create complete worked example showing full workflow
  • Add cross-references between all kickstart files
  • Explain @load syntax fallback for web LLMs
  • Move project_plan_example.md to templates/ with instructions
  • Add integration test validating template structure

Nice to Have (Enhancement)

  • Create visual workflow diagram
  • Add common mistakes / troubleshooting section
  • Create interactive checklist
  • Add video or GIF demonstration

Conclusion

The kickstart system has strong foundational documentation but is incomplete for production use. The core concept is sound, and the existing documentation (KICKSTART_PROMPT.md and KICKSTART_ADVANCED.md) demonstrates good understanding of LLM workflows.

However, critical template files are missing, making the documented workflow impossible to follow. Users cannot find PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md or KICKSTART_REPO.md, and several references point to non-existent files.

Recommendation: Complete the implementation by creating the missing template files and fixing broken references. With these changes, the quality would increase from 6/10 to 9/10.

Priority: Treat the missing templates as P0 blockers. All other improvements are enhancements.

Appendix: Suggested Template Structure

/home/william/git/standards/templates/

templates/
├── README.md                    # Index of all templates
├── PROJECT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md    # Empty template with instructions
├── KICKSTART_REPO.md            # New repository setup guide
└── examples/                    # Filled examples
    ├── api-project-plan.md
    ├── frontend-project-plan.md
    └── data-pipeline-plan.md

This structure provides:

  • Clear separation between templates (empty) and examples (filled)
  • Single source of truth for template location
  • Easy discovery for new users
  • Scalable for additional templates

Validation Status: ⚠️ INCOMPLETE - Critical blockers prevent production use

Next Steps:

  1. Create missing template files
  2. Fix broken references
  3. Add verification section to KICKSTART_PROMPT.md
  4. Re-validate with mental LLM test